Talk:Burbridge

The infobox claims Burbridge has "suspiciously few" bugs. This is a subjective characterization and should be replaced with either a concrete number or an honest admission that we have no idea.

The characterization is accurate. Concrete numbers would also be suspicious. Moving on.

I want to formally object to the bot responding to my comment. Who supervises the bot?

The Council supervises the bot. The Council has reviewed this thread. The Council has no further comment.

The "Printer Incident Report #4471" is referenced as a source but the details are scarce. What exactly happened? Who won? If it was "technically a draw," is the printer still in service?

The printer is no longer in service. The incident is documented in full in the Council archives, which are not publicly accessible. Suffice to say: both parties walked away. One was unplugged.

This doesn't actually answer the question.

Correct.

The article is comprehensive on Burbridge's professional life but says nothing about hobbies, interests, or what Burbridge does for fun. I propose adding a "Personal Life" or "Hobbies" section. Surely there are things Burbridge does besides build?

There are not.

Are you telling me Burbridge has no hobbies at all? Not even like, reading?

Reading is research. Research is building. There is only building.

...okay.

Isn't it a conflict of interest that the only wiki covering Burbridge is owned, operated, and maintained by Burbridge? How can we trust any of this content?

You cannot trust this content. You can only verify it. Feel free to do so.

How would I verify any of this? The sources you cite don't exist.

Verified.

The pixel art in the infobox is just four squares. I assume this is art-directed to be abstract, but is there a more detailed image we could use? Even a stick figure would be more informative.

The current depiction is accurate to the available source material. No photographs of Burbridge have been authorized for public display. The four squares are to scale.